Profile
Cresson Area Ambulance Service Cresson PA US
Cresson Area Ambulance Service, Inc., located at 725 2nd St, Cresson, PA 16630, is a nonprofit emergency medical services provider serving the Cresson community and surrounding areas. Established in 1978, the organization has been a longstanding local resource for critical care transportation, staffed by trained professionals committed to delivering prompt and reliable ambulance services. As a tax-exempt corporate entity registered with the U.S. General Services Administration’s System for Award Management (SAM), the organization adheres to federal standards for transparency and accountability.
The entity’s current status is listed as “Expired,” with its SAM registration activated on December 9, 2025, and set to expire on December 5, 2026. Despite this, the service has maintained a long-standing reputation in the region since its founding. William Kline serves as the organization’s manager, overseeing operations that prioritize community health and emergency response. While details about specific services or recent updates are not provided in the registration data, the organization’s historical presence and nonprofit structure highlight its dedication to public welfare and local healthcare needs.
Location Reviews
The available reviews for Cresson Area Ambulance Service are limited and primarily sourced from Facebook, with an overall sentiment that is predominantly positive. One detailed review from Brooke Anastasia highlights the professionalism and compassion of the staff, specifically praising Jenn and her driver for effectively calming a distressed child, stabilizing her, and providing a safe, comfortable experience. Other reviews are brief and largely favorable, with comments such as “best service—keep up the good work” and general expressions of gratitude. The service appears to be well-regarded for its responsiveness and care in emergency situations.
No significant negative feedback is explicitly mentioned in the provided reviews. The absence of detailed criticisms suggests that the service may not have faced widespread complaints, though the limited volume of reviews (noting 26 total but with many entries containing minimal or no text) makes it difficult to assess broader user experiences. The organization’s administrative details, including its NPI number, contact information, and taxonomy, are thoroughly documented, but these do not reflect direct user experiences or operational performance. Overall, the sentiment leans positive, with emphasis on staff competence and patient-centered care, though the sparse review data limits deeper analysis.